🇪🇪Personal Data Protection Act
Personal Data Protection Act
Estonia applies this national law alongside the GDPR. The summary below concentrates on the national overlay so that the GDPR baseline is not duplicated.
Status: Official English consolidation in force from 16 March 2026
Citation: Isikuandmete kaitse seadus, especially ss. 4-11 and 56-73
Regulator: Estonian Data Protection Inspectorate
Source basis: Official Riigi Teataja English PDF in force 16 March 2026 downloaded and checked on 22 August 2026.
How the national law fits with GDPR
The Act supplements the GDPR, transposes the Law Enforcement Directive and adds Estonian provisions for expression, research, archiving, children, deceased persons, debt data, public recording, supervision and offences.
National additions and variations
- Section 8 sets 13 as the age for consent-based information-society services offered directly to a child.
- Sections 4 and 5 permit journalistic and academic, artistic or literary processing only under the stated public-interest or expression conditions and where disclosure does not cause excessive damage.
- Sections 6 and 7 require pseudonymisation or equivalent protection for research, statistics and archiving, with additional ethics-committee or Inspectorate review where identifiable or special-category data is used without consent.
- Section 9 extends consent for ten years after death, or twenty years for a minor, subject to statutory exceptions and successor rights.
- Sections 10 and 11 add accuracy, legal-basis, registration and prejudice safeguards for debt data and permit public-place recording for later disclosure only where notice and the statutory conditions are satisfied.
The Riigi Teataja English consolidation is official but the authentic Estonian text controls. A later wording is already scheduled for 1 October 2026 and must not be applied early.
Operational approach
First maintain the GDPR control set. Then document whether this country is in scope and apply the national controls to the affected people, systems and processing. Keep article-level evidence for child consent, employment, special-category or criminal data, research, electronic communications, identifiers, surveillance and any rights restriction relied upon.
Do not treat GDPR compliance as automatic compliance with IKS. Record the national trigger, the responsible owner, the local procedure and the current official source reviewed.