Alabama Personal Data Protection Act
Alabama Attorney General
← Back to laws in United States
Tennessee Information Protection Act is part of the United States state privacy-law framework. It regulates covered processing of personal data about Tennessee residents and must be assessed separately from federal sectoral laws and other states' statutes.
Effective status: July 1, 2025
Citation: Tenn. Code Ann. ss. 47-18-3301 et seq.
Source basis: Tennessee Public Chapter 408 (2023), as amended including Public Chapter 201 (2025).
The Act applies to persons conducting business in Tennessee or targeting Tennessee residents that exceed $25 million in revenue and meet one of the statutory processing or sale thresholds. Current exemptions include the 2025 revision concerning qualifying public utilities.
Thresholds must be calculated using the law's defined consumer population and lookback period. Exemptions should be recorded at entity, data and processing-activity level; an exemption covering one regulated dataset should not automatically be applied to unrelated marketing, website, workforce or customer-support data.
Consumers may confirm processing, access, correct and delete personal information, obtain portable data and opt out of sale, targeted advertising and qualifying profiling. Controllers must authenticate requests and provide an appeal route.
The operational workflow should authenticate requests without collecting excessive new data, meet the applicable response period, document extensions and denials, propagate deletion and opt-out decisions where required, and preserve evidence of the response and any appeal.
Controllers must minimize collection, secure data, limit incompatible uses, obtain consent for sensitive data, publish notices, bind processors by contract and assess listed high-risk processing.
Processor agreements should identify instructions, purpose, duration, data types, confidentiality, subprocessor controls, deletion or return, audit information and assistance with rights, security, breach response and assessments to the extent required by the statute.
TIPA creates an affirmative defense where a controller or processor establishes, maintains and reasonably conforms to a written privacy program aligned with the NIST Privacy Framework or another qualifying standard and updates it when the referenced framework changes.
The Tennessee Attorney General has exclusive enforcement authority. The statute provides a cure process, civil penalties and enhanced penalties for willful or knowing violations.
Maintain an applicability memorandum, data map, notice versions, request and appeal logs, consent and opt-out records, processor contracts, assessment records, security evidence and a dated record of the official statutory version used. Recheck the official legislature and regulator sources before each scheduled legal review.
Use a shared multi-state privacy operating model, but configure it for this law's exact scope, exemptions, rights, deadlines, consent rules, opt-out signals, assessment triggers and enforcement provisions. Do not substitute a generic US privacy checklist for the state-specific controls.
Alabama Attorney General
California Privacy Protection Agency
California Privacy Protection Agency
California Privacy Protection Agency
Federal Trade Commission
United States Department of Justice
Colorado Attorney General
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights
Connecticut Attorney General
Federal Trade Commission
Federal Communications Commission
Delaware Department of Justice
United States Department of Justice and federal courts
United States Department of Justice
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
U.S. Department of Education, Student Privacy Policy Office
Federal Trade Commission
Florida Department of Legal Affairs
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and federal health agencies
Federal Trade Commission
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights
Illinois Attorney General and private enforcement
Indiana Attorney General
Iowa Attorney General
Kentucky Attorney General
Louisiana Attorney General
Maryland Attorney General
Minnesota Attorney General
Montana Attorney General, Office of Consumer Protection
Nebraska Attorney General
Nevada Attorney General
New Hampshire Attorney General
New Jersey Attorney General and Division of Consumer Affairs
Oklahoma Attorney General
Oregon Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties
Rhode Island Attorney General
Federal Communications Commission
Texas Attorney General
Texas Attorney General
Utah Attorney General and Division of Consumer Protection
Vermont Attorney General
United States Department of Justice and federal courts
Virginia Attorney General
Washington Attorney General
Washington Attorney General