Alabama Personal Data Protection Act
Alabama Attorney General
← Back to laws in United States
Connecticut Data Privacy Act is part of the United States state privacy-law framework. It regulates covered processing of personal data about Connecticut residents and must be assessed separately from federal sectoral laws and other states' statutes.
Effective status: July 1, 2023
Citation: Conn. Gen. Stat. ss. 42-515 through 42-526
Source basis: Connecticut General Assembly 2026 Supplement, Chapter 743jj; Public Act 26-64 as amended by Public Act 26-100 for enacted October 1, 2026 changes.
The Act applies to persons conducting business in Connecticut or targeting Connecticut residents that satisfy the current processing thresholds in section 42-516. The operative text includes the 2026 Supplement and changes made by Public Act 25-113 that took effect July 1, 2026; the original 2022 enactment is no longer sufficient.
Thresholds must be calculated using the law's defined consumer population and lookback period. Exemptions should be recorded at entity, data and processing-activity level; an exemption covering one regulated dataset should not automatically be applied to unrelated marketing, website, workforce or customer-support data.
Consumers may access, correct, delete and obtain portable copies of personal data, and opt out of targeted advertising, sale and qualifying profiling. Authorized agents and universal opt-out signals are recognized for specified opt-outs, and denied requests are subject to appeal.
The operational workflow should authenticate requests without collecting excessive new data, meet the applicable response period, document extensions and denials, propagate deletion and opt-out decisions where required, and preserve evidence of the response and any appeal.
Controllers must limit collection, avoid incompatible processing without consent, secure data, obtain consent for sensitive data, publish a clear notice, maintain request methods, bind processors by contract and assess processing presenting heightened risk.
Processor agreements should identify instructions, purpose, duration, data types, confidentiality, subprocessor controls, deletion or return, audit information and assistance with rights, security, breach response and assessments to the extent required by the statute.
Current controls must include Connecticut protections for consumer health data, minors, online services and other higher-risk processing. Public Act 26-64, as amended by Public Act 26-100, adds data-broker, deletion-mechanism, profiling, facial-recognition and precise-geolocation rules, most of which take effect October 1, 2026 and therefore require a separately dated implementation plan.
The Connecticut Attorney General has exclusive enforcement authority. The statutory cure structure has changed over time and must be checked for the date and circumstances of the conduct.
Maintain an applicability memorandum, data map, notice versions, request and appeal logs, consent and opt-out records, processor contracts, assessment records, security evidence and a dated record of the official statutory version used. Recheck the official legislature and regulator sources before each scheduled legal review.
Use a shared multi-state privacy operating model, but configure it for this law's exact scope, exemptions, rights, deadlines, consent rules, opt-out signals, assessment triggers and enforcement provisions. Do not substitute a generic US privacy checklist for the state-specific controls.
Alabama Attorney General
California Privacy Protection Agency
California Privacy Protection Agency
California Privacy Protection Agency
Federal Trade Commission
United States Department of Justice
Colorado Attorney General
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights
Federal Trade Commission
Federal Communications Commission
Delaware Department of Justice
United States Department of Justice and federal courts
United States Department of Justice
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
U.S. Department of Education, Student Privacy Policy Office
Federal Trade Commission
Florida Department of Legal Affairs
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and federal health agencies
Federal Trade Commission
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights
Illinois Attorney General and private enforcement
Indiana Attorney General
Iowa Attorney General
Kentucky Attorney General
Louisiana Attorney General
Maryland Attorney General
Minnesota Attorney General
Montana Attorney General, Office of Consumer Protection
Nebraska Attorney General
Nevada Attorney General
New Hampshire Attorney General
New Jersey Attorney General and Division of Consumer Affairs
Oklahoma Attorney General
Oregon Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties
Rhode Island Attorney General
Federal Communications Commission
Tennessee Attorney General
Texas Attorney General
Texas Attorney General
Utah Attorney General and Division of Consumer Protection
Vermont Attorney General
United States Department of Justice and federal courts
Virginia Attorney General
Washington Attorney General
Washington Attorney General