Alabama Personal Data Protection Act
Alabama Attorney General
← Back to laws in United States
Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act is part of the United States sectoral privacy framework. It should be applied to the covered actor, record, communication, service or practice identified by the statute rather than treated as a general law for all personal data.
Effective status: Enacted May 21, 2008; principal employment provisions effective November 21, 2009
Citation: Pub. L. 110-233; 42 U.S.C. ss. 2000ff et seq.; 29 C.F.R. Part 1635
Source basis: Current 42 U.S.C. sections 2000ff et seq., current 29 C.F.R. Part 1635 and official EEOC guidance.
GINA Title I restricts use of genetic information in health coverage, and Title II prohibits employment discrimination based on genetic information for covered employers, employment agencies, labor organisations and training programs. Genetic information includes family medical history and specified genetic services and tests.
Covered employers must not request, require or purchase genetic information except under a narrow exception; must keep any lawfully acquired genetic information confidential and separate; must limit disclosure; and must not use it in employment decisions. Health plans and issuers must comply with underwriting and premium restrictions.
Maintain an evidence-based applicability decision, identify the systems and records within scope, assign owners, configure access and disclosure controls, document legal bases and exceptions, train relevant staff and retain the records needed to demonstrate compliance.
Wellness programs, medical questionnaires, leave certification, occupational health and casual acquisition can create GINA risk. Requests should use the current EEOC safe-harbor warning where appropriate and collect no more information than the applicable exception permits.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission enforces Title II using the Title VII remedial framework. Federal health agencies enforce Title I provisions within their respective jurisdictions.
Map this law to specific products, records, communications and teams. Verify current statutory and regulatory text before relying on an exception, consent, permissible purpose or enforcement assumption.
Alabama Attorney General
California Privacy Protection Agency
California Privacy Protection Agency
California Privacy Protection Agency
Federal Trade Commission
United States Department of Justice
Colorado Attorney General
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights
Connecticut Attorney General
Federal Trade Commission
Federal Communications Commission
Delaware Department of Justice
United States Department of Justice and federal courts
United States Department of Justice
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
U.S. Department of Education, Student Privacy Policy Office
Federal Trade Commission
Florida Department of Legal Affairs
Federal Trade Commission
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights
Illinois Attorney General and private enforcement
Indiana Attorney General
Iowa Attorney General
Kentucky Attorney General
Louisiana Attorney General
Maryland Attorney General
Minnesota Attorney General
Montana Attorney General, Office of Consumer Protection
Nebraska Attorney General
Nevada Attorney General
New Hampshire Attorney General
New Jersey Attorney General and Division of Consumer Affairs
Oklahoma Attorney General
Oregon Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties
Rhode Island Attorney General
Federal Communications Commission
Tennessee Attorney General
Texas Attorney General
Texas Attorney General
Utah Attorney General and Division of Consumer Protection
Vermont Attorney General
United States Department of Justice and federal courts
Virginia Attorney General
Washington Attorney General
Washington Attorney General