Alabama Personal Data Protection Act
Alabama Attorney General
← Back to laws in United States
The Delaware Personal Data Privacy Act creates a consumer privacy framework for Delaware residents. It follows the controller and processor model used in several US state privacy laws and gives consumers rights over personal data processed by covered controllers. The Act should be read as part of the wider US state privacy landscape rather than as a standalone national privacy code.
For businesses, the Delaware law is important because it includes a broad set of consumer rights, recognises authorised agents for opt-out rights and requires privacy notices, request handling and processor contracts.
A consumer is a Delaware resident acting in an individual context. The definition excludes individuals acting in commercial or employment contexts. The law regulates personal data linked or reasonably linkable to an identified or identifiable individual, while excluding categories such as de-identified data and publicly available information where the statutory conditions are met.
The Act also uses defined concepts such as controller, processor, consent, sensitive data, biometric data, genetic data, targeted advertising, sale of personal data and profiling. These definitions determine whether a business needs opt-outs, consent or additional governance controls.
Consumer rights: confirm processing, access, correction, deletion, portability, third-party category list and opt-out rights.
Opt-out rights: consumers may opt out of targeted advertising, sale of personal data and certain profiling.
Response timelines: controllers generally must respond without undue delay and not later than 45 days, with a possible 45-day extension where reasonably necessary.
Appeal process: controllers must provide a process for consumers to appeal refusal to act on a request.
Processor contracts: controller-processor relationships should be governed by written terms setting out processing instructions and duties.
Delaware gives consumers meaningful control over their personal data. A consumer may confirm whether personal data is being processed, access it, correct inaccuracies, delete personal data provided by or obtained about the consumer, obtain a portable copy and obtain a list of categories of third parties to whom personal data has been disclosed.
The opt-out right covers targeted advertising, sale of personal data and profiling in furtherance of solely automated decisions that produce legal or similarly significant effects. Parents or guardians may exercise rights for known children, and authorised agents may be used for opt-out rights where the statutory requirements are met.
Controllers should provide a privacy notice that explains what personal data is processed, why it is processed, what is shared, with whom it is shared, and how consumers can exercise their rights. The notice should match the actual processing practices of the organisation.
Controllers should also apply purpose limitation, data minimisation, reasonable security practices and non-discrimination principles. Sensitive data and children’s data should be reviewed carefully because they can trigger consent or child-specific requirements.
The right to obtain a list of categories of third parties is easy to miss. Vendor and disclosure mapping should identify not only categories of data, but also categories of recipients.
Delaware’s controller and processor structure means vendor relationships should be documented. Processor contracts should identify the nature and purpose of processing, the type of data, duration, instructions, confidentiality duties, deletion or return obligations and support for consumer request and security obligations.
Controllers should classify recipients correctly. A vendor acting under instructions is different from an independent third party receiving data for its own purposes. This classification affects notice, opt-out and contract requirements.
If you fall under the Delaware law, build a Delaware-ready rights workflow, update the privacy notice, map targeted advertising and sale activity, review sensitive data processing, and ensure processor contracts contain the required operational terms.
Alabama Attorney General
California Privacy Protection Agency
California Privacy Protection Agency
California Privacy Protection Agency
Federal Trade Commission
United States Department of Justice
Colorado Attorney General
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights
Connecticut Attorney General
Federal Trade Commission
Federal Communications Commission
United States Department of Justice and federal courts
United States Department of Justice
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
U.S. Department of Education, Student Privacy Policy Office
Federal Trade Commission
Florida Department of Legal Affairs
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and federal health agencies
Federal Trade Commission
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights
Illinois Attorney General and private enforcement
Indiana Attorney General
Iowa Attorney General
Kentucky Attorney General
Louisiana Attorney General
Maryland Attorney General
Minnesota Attorney General
Montana Attorney General, Office of Consumer Protection
Nebraska Attorney General
Nevada Attorney General
New Hampshire Attorney General
New Jersey Attorney General and Division of Consumer Affairs
Oklahoma Attorney General
Oregon Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties
Rhode Island Attorney General
Federal Communications Commission
Tennessee Attorney General
Texas Attorney General
Texas Attorney General
Utah Attorney General and Division of Consumer Protection
Vermont Attorney General
United States Department of Justice and federal courts
Virginia Attorney General
Washington Attorney General
Washington Attorney General