Alabama Personal Data Protection Act
Alabama Attorney General
← Back to laws in United States
The Texas Data Privacy and Security Act creates a state privacy framework for personal data processed in relation to Texas consumers. It uses the controller and processor model but has a distinctive applicability rule. It applies to a person that conducts business in Texas or produces products or services consumed by Texas residents, processes or sells personal data, and is not a small business as defined by the United States Small Business Administration, subject to statutory exceptions.
For organisations serving Texas residents, the law requires privacy notices, consumer rights handling, sensitive data consent, processor contracts, data protection assessments and Attorney General-facing evidence.
The Act excludes several entities and data categories, including certain state agencies, financial institutions or data subject to Title V of GLBA, covered entities or business associates governed by HIPAA rules, nonprofit organisations, institutions of higher education and specified utilities. It also exempts categories such as protected health information, certain research information, FCRA-regulated activity, FERPA-regulated data and other federally regulated data.
These exemptions should be mapped carefully. A business can have some data that is exempt and other personal data that remains covered.
Applicability: doing business in Texas or producing products or services consumed by Texas residents, processing or selling personal data, and not being a covered small business, subject to exceptions.
Consumer rights: access, correction, deletion, portability and opt-out rights for targeted advertising, sale and certain profiling.
Privacy notice: controllers must provide a clear notice describing data categories, purposes, rights mechanisms and third-party sharing.
Sensitive data: controllers may not process sensitive data without consumer consent, and known children’s data must be handled consistently with COPPA.
Data protection assessments: required for targeted advertising, sale, high-risk profiling, sensitive data and other heightened-risk processing.
Texas consumers may exercise rights in relation to their personal data, including the right to confirm processing, access data, correct inaccuracies, delete personal data, obtain a portable copy and opt out of processing for targeted advertising, sale of personal data or profiling in furtherance of decisions producing legal or similarly significant effects.
Controllers generally must respond without undue delay and not later than 45 days after receiving the request, with a possible additional 45 days where reasonably necessary. If a request is declined, the controller must explain the justification and provide appeal instructions.
A Texas privacy notice should describe categories of personal data processed, purposes, how consumers may exercise rights and appeal, categories of data shared with third parties, categories of third parties, and methods for submitting rights requests.
If a controller sells sensitive personal data, the Act requires a specific notice. If a controller sells biometric data, a specific notice is also required. These notices should be placed in the same location and manner as the privacy notice.
Texas has a broad practical reach because the applicability test does not use the same high numerical processing threshold found in some other states. Businesses should not assume they are out of scope merely because they process fewer than 100,000 consumers.
Controllers must conduct and document data protection assessments for specified higher-risk processing, including targeted advertising, sale of personal data, certain profiling, sensitive data processing and other processing that presents heightened risk of harm. The assessment should weigh benefits against risks to consumer rights and consider safeguards, deidentified data, consumer expectations, context and the controller-consumer relationship.
The Attorney General may request assessments through the statutory enforcement process. Businesses should therefore prepare assessments as compliance evidence, not as informal internal notes.
If Texas law applies, prioritise a Texas-specific privacy notice, consumer request workflow, sensitive data consent, opt-out mechanisms, processor contracts and data protection assessments. Pay close attention to sale, targeted advertising, profiling and biometric data notices.
Alabama Attorney General
California Privacy Protection Agency
California Privacy Protection Agency
California Privacy Protection Agency
Federal Trade Commission
United States Department of Justice
Colorado Attorney General
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights
Connecticut Attorney General
Federal Trade Commission
Federal Communications Commission
Delaware Department of Justice
United States Department of Justice and federal courts
United States Department of Justice
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
U.S. Department of Education, Student Privacy Policy Office
Federal Trade Commission
Florida Department of Legal Affairs
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and federal health agencies
Federal Trade Commission
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights
Illinois Attorney General and private enforcement
Indiana Attorney General
Iowa Attorney General
Kentucky Attorney General
Louisiana Attorney General
Maryland Attorney General
Minnesota Attorney General
Montana Attorney General, Office of Consumer Protection
Nebraska Attorney General
Nevada Attorney General
New Hampshire Attorney General
New Jersey Attorney General and Division of Consumer Affairs
Oklahoma Attorney General
Oregon Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties
Rhode Island Attorney General
Federal Communications Commission
Tennessee Attorney General
Texas Attorney General
Utah Attorney General and Division of Consumer Protection
Vermont Attorney General
United States Department of Justice and federal courts
Virginia Attorney General
Washington Attorney General
Washington Attorney General