Alabama Personal Data Protection Act
Alabama Attorney General
← Back to laws in United States
Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act is part of the United States state privacy-law framework. It regulates covered processing of personal data about Minnesota residents and must be assessed separately from federal sectoral laws and other states' statutes.
Effective status: July 31, 2025; certain postsecondary institutions July 31, 2029
Citation: Minn. Stat. ss. 325M.10 through 325M.21
Source basis: Current Minnesota Statutes Chapter 325M, official Revisor publication.
The Act applies to legal entities conducting business in Minnesota or targeting Minnesota residents that meet the statutory processing thresholds, with exemptions listed in section 325M.12. Small businesses have a narrower but important sensitive-data sale restriction.
Thresholds must be calculated using the law's defined consumer population and lookback period. Exemptions should be recorded at entity, data and processing-activity level; an exemption covering one regulated dataset should not automatically be applied to unrelated marketing, website, workforce or customer-support data.
Consumers have access, correction, deletion, portability and opt-out rights, plus rights concerning profiling decisions, questions about profiling results and review of certain profiling decisions. Authorized agents and opt-out preference signals are recognized.
The operational workflow should authenticate requests without collecting excessive new data, meet the applicable response period, document extensions and denials, propagate deletion and opt-out decisions where required, and preserve evidence of the response and any appeal.
Controllers must maintain privacy policies and procedures, inventory data, document retention, publish notices, secure data, obtain sensitive-data consent, manage processors, avoid discriminatory processing and conduct assessments.
Processor agreements should identify instructions, purpose, duration, data types, confidentiality, subprocessor controls, deletion or return, audit information and assistance with rights, security, breach response and assessments to the extent required by the statute.
Minnesota requires documentation of privacy policies and procedures and gives unusually detailed rights concerning profiling. It also prohibits attempts to identify subjects of data collected with only pseudonymous identifiers in specified circumstances.
The Minnesota Attorney General enforces the Act. A phased cure provision applies only for the statutory initial period.
Maintain an applicability memorandum, data map, notice versions, request and appeal logs, consent and opt-out records, processor contracts, assessment records, security evidence and a dated record of the official statutory version used. Recheck the official legislature and regulator sources before each scheduled legal review.
Use a shared multi-state privacy operating model, but configure it for this law's exact scope, exemptions, rights, deadlines, consent rules, opt-out signals, assessment triggers and enforcement provisions. Do not substitute a generic US privacy checklist for the state-specific controls.
Alabama Attorney General
California Privacy Protection Agency
California Privacy Protection Agency
California Privacy Protection Agency
Federal Trade Commission
United States Department of Justice
Colorado Attorney General
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights
Connecticut Attorney General
Federal Trade Commission
Federal Communications Commission
Delaware Department of Justice
United States Department of Justice and federal courts
United States Department of Justice
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
U.S. Department of Education, Student Privacy Policy Office
Federal Trade Commission
Florida Department of Legal Affairs
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and federal health agencies
Federal Trade Commission
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights
Illinois Attorney General and private enforcement
Indiana Attorney General
Iowa Attorney General
Kentucky Attorney General
Louisiana Attorney General
Maryland Attorney General
Montana Attorney General, Office of Consumer Protection
Nebraska Attorney General
Nevada Attorney General
New Hampshire Attorney General
New Jersey Attorney General and Division of Consumer Affairs
Oklahoma Attorney General
Oregon Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties
Rhode Island Attorney General
Federal Communications Commission
Tennessee Attorney General
Texas Attorney General
Texas Attorney General
Utah Attorney General and Division of Consumer Protection
Vermont Attorney General
United States Department of Justice and federal courts
Virginia Attorney General
Washington Attorney General
Washington Attorney General