Alabama Personal Data Protection Act
Alabama Attorney General
← Back to laws in United States
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act is a major United States financial privacy law. Its privacy provisions are built around nonpublic personal information handled by financial institutions. The law recognises that financial institutions have an affirmative and continuing obligation to respect customer privacy and protect the security and confidentiality of customer information.
GLBA compliance is usually discussed through two practical pillars: privacy notices and information sharing controls, and safeguards for customer information. It is especially important for banks, lenders, insurance businesses, securities firms, financial advisors, fintechs and other businesses that fall within the meaning of financial institution for the relevant rule.
GLBA restricts disclosure of nonpublic personal information to nonaffiliated third parties unless the financial institution provides the required notice and, where applicable, an opportunity to opt out. The privacy notice should describe the institution’s information-sharing practices and the consumer’s choices.
The law also contains exceptions, including disclosures for servicing, processing transactions, maintaining accounts, compliance, fraud prevention and other permitted purposes. These exceptions should be applied carefully and documented.
Privacy obligation: financial institutions must respect customer privacy and protect customer information.
Notice: consumers must receive privacy notices explaining information-sharing practices.
Opt-out: disclosure to nonaffiliated third parties may require a clear opt-out opportunity unless an exception applies.
Safeguards: administrative, technical and physical safeguards must protect customer records and information.
Vendor confidentiality: third parties receiving information to perform services should be bound by confidentiality and use restrictions.
GLBA requires standards for administrative, technical and physical safeguards. These safeguards should protect the security and confidentiality of customer records, protect against anticipated threats or hazards, and protect against unauthorised access or use that could cause substantial harm or inconvenience to a customer.
In practice, this means a written security programme, risk assessment, access controls, vendor oversight, incident response, encryption or equivalent controls where appropriate, employee training and ongoing monitoring. The exact requirements may depend on the regulator and rule applicable to the institution.
A financial institution should know when it shares information with affiliates, nonaffiliated third parties, service providers, joint marketing partners, payment processors, cloud vendors, analytics providers and other recipients. Each disclosure should be classified against the GLBA notice, opt-out and exception framework.
Vendor contracts should restrict use and disclosure, require confidentiality, support security obligations and provide incident escalation. The fact that a disclosure is operationally convenient does not automatically make it compliant.
Many fintech businesses focus on app privacy notices but miss GLBA vendor and safeguards obligations. If the business is a financial institution for GLBA purposes, information security and third-party controls are central compliance obligations.
Many state consumer privacy laws include exemptions for financial institutions or data subject to Title V of GLBA. The wording of the exemption matters. Some exemptions are entity-level, some are data-level and some depend on whether the particular processing activity is actually regulated by GLBA.
A financial institution should still map non-GLBA data flows, including website analytics, employment data, marketing leads and product telemetry, to determine whether other privacy laws apply.
If you handle financial customer information in the United States, treat GLBA as a privacy and security programme. Build accurate notices, opt-out handling where required, third-party confidentiality controls, a written safeguards programme, breach response and evidence that security controls are actively maintained.
Alabama Attorney General
California Privacy Protection Agency
California Privacy Protection Agency
California Privacy Protection Agency
Federal Trade Commission
United States Department of Justice
Colorado Attorney General
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights
Connecticut Attorney General
Federal Trade Commission
Federal Communications Commission
Delaware Department of Justice
United States Department of Justice and federal courts
United States Department of Justice
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
U.S. Department of Education, Student Privacy Policy Office
Federal Trade Commission
Florida Department of Legal Affairs
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and federal health agencies
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights
Illinois Attorney General and private enforcement
Indiana Attorney General
Iowa Attorney General
Kentucky Attorney General
Louisiana Attorney General
Maryland Attorney General
Minnesota Attorney General
Montana Attorney General, Office of Consumer Protection
Nebraska Attorney General
Nevada Attorney General
New Hampshire Attorney General
New Jersey Attorney General and Division of Consumer Affairs
Oklahoma Attorney General
Oregon Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties
Rhode Island Attorney General
Federal Communications Commission
Tennessee Attorney General
Texas Attorney General
Texas Attorney General
Utah Attorney General and Division of Consumer Protection
Vermont Attorney General
United States Department of Justice and federal courts
Virginia Attorney General
Washington Attorney General
Washington Attorney General