Alabama Personal Data Protection Act
Alabama Attorney General
← Back to laws in United States
Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act is part of the United States sectoral privacy framework. It should be applied to the covered actor, record, communication, service or practice identified by the statute rather than treated as a general law for all personal data.
Effective status: February 17, 2009, with provisions phased in by statute and rule
Citation: HITECH Act, Pub. L. 111-5, Division A, Title XIII and Division B, Title IV
Source basis: Official enrolled Public Law 111-5 and current HHS HIPAA and breach-notification materials.
HITECH strengthened HIPAA privacy, security, breach-notification and enforcement requirements and extended direct duties to business associates. Applicability must be read with the current HIPAA Privacy, Security, Breach Notification and Enforcement Rules.
Covered entities and business associates must implement current HIPAA safeguards, execute business associate agreements, investigate impermissible uses and disclosures, conduct the breach risk assessment, notify affected individuals and authorities when required and retain compliance evidence.
Maintain an evidence-based applicability decision, identify the systems and records within scope, assign owners, configure access and disclosure controls, document legal bases and exceptions, train relevant staff and retain the records needed to demonstrate compliance.
HITECH cannot be implemented as a standalone checklist detached from HIPAA regulations. The current regulatory text and HHS guidance control operational details, including breach notification and business-associate responsibilities.
HHS Office for Civil Rights enforces HIPAA as amended by HITECH. State Attorneys General also have statutory enforcement authority, and criminal matters may be referred to the Department of Justice.
Map this law to specific products, records, communications and teams. Verify current statutory and regulatory text before relying on an exception, consent, permissible purpose or enforcement assumption.
Alabama Attorney General
California Privacy Protection Agency
California Privacy Protection Agency
California Privacy Protection Agency
Federal Trade Commission
United States Department of Justice
Colorado Attorney General
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights
Connecticut Attorney General
Federal Trade Commission
Federal Communications Commission
Delaware Department of Justice
United States Department of Justice and federal courts
United States Department of Justice
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
U.S. Department of Education, Student Privacy Policy Office
Federal Trade Commission
Florida Department of Legal Affairs
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and federal health agencies
Federal Trade Commission
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights
Illinois Attorney General and private enforcement
Indiana Attorney General
Iowa Attorney General
Kentucky Attorney General
Louisiana Attorney General
Maryland Attorney General
Minnesota Attorney General
Montana Attorney General, Office of Consumer Protection
Nebraska Attorney General
Nevada Attorney General
New Hampshire Attorney General
New Jersey Attorney General and Division of Consumer Affairs
Oklahoma Attorney General
Oregon Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties
Rhode Island Attorney General
Federal Communications Commission
Tennessee Attorney General
Texas Attorney General
Texas Attorney General
Utah Attorney General and Division of Consumer Protection
Vermont Attorney General
United States Department of Justice and federal courts
Virginia Attorney General
Washington Attorney General
Washington Attorney General