Alabama Personal Data Protection Act
Alabama Attorney General
← Back to laws in United States
Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act is part of the United States state privacy-law framework. It regulates covered processing of personal data about Montana residents and must be assessed separately from federal sectoral laws and other states' statutes.
Effective status: October 1, 2024; substantially revised October 1, 2025
Citation: Mont. Code Ann. ss. 30-14-2801 through 30-14-2820
Source basis: 2025 Montana Code Annotated, Part 28, plus the Montana Department of Justice SB 297 implementation page.
The current Act applies under the revised thresholds and exemptions in sections 30-14-2803 and 30-14-2804. Senate Bill 297 changed applicability and removed the broad GLBA entity exemption while retaining or adding more specific exemptions.
Thresholds must be calculated using the law's defined consumer population and lookback period. Exemptions should be recorded at entity, data and processing-activity level; an exemption covering one regulated dataset should not automatically be applied to unrelated marketing, website, workforce or customer-support data.
Consumers may access, correct, delete and obtain portable data, and opt out of sale, targeted advertising and qualifying profiling. The Act recognizes authorized agents and requires a consumer appeal process.
The operational workflow should authenticate requests without collecting excessive new data, meet the applicable response period, document extensions and denials, propagate deletion and opt-out decisions where required, and preserve evidence of the response and any appeal.
Controllers must provide request mechanisms and notices, limit collection and use, secure personal data, obtain consent for sensitive data, manage processors by contract and conduct data protection assessments. The current law also imposes enhanced protections for minors and related assessments.
Processor agreements should identify instructions, purpose, duration, data types, confidentiality, subprocessor controls, deletion or return, audit information and assistance with rights, security, breach response and assessments to the extent required by the statute.
Use the post-SB 297 text. The Montana Department of Justice expressly warns that the 2025 revisions changed exemptions, controller duties and protections for minors.
The Montana Attorney General enforces the Act and may seek civil penalties and injunctive relief. There is no general private right of action.
Maintain an applicability memorandum, data map, notice versions, request and appeal logs, consent and opt-out records, processor contracts, assessment records, security evidence and a dated record of the official statutory version used. Recheck the official legislature and regulator sources before each scheduled legal review.
Use a shared multi-state privacy operating model, but configure it for this law's exact scope, exemptions, rights, deadlines, consent rules, opt-out signals, assessment triggers and enforcement provisions. Do not substitute a generic US privacy checklist for the state-specific controls.
Alabama Attorney General
California Privacy Protection Agency
California Privacy Protection Agency
California Privacy Protection Agency
Federal Trade Commission
United States Department of Justice
Colorado Attorney General
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights
Connecticut Attorney General
Federal Trade Commission
Federal Communications Commission
Delaware Department of Justice
United States Department of Justice and federal courts
United States Department of Justice
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
U.S. Department of Education, Student Privacy Policy Office
Federal Trade Commission
Florida Department of Legal Affairs
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and federal health agencies
Federal Trade Commission
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights
Illinois Attorney General and private enforcement
Indiana Attorney General
Iowa Attorney General
Kentucky Attorney General
Louisiana Attorney General
Maryland Attorney General
Minnesota Attorney General
Nebraska Attorney General
Nevada Attorney General
New Hampshire Attorney General
New Jersey Attorney General and Division of Consumer Affairs
Oklahoma Attorney General
Oregon Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties
Rhode Island Attorney General
Federal Communications Commission
Tennessee Attorney General
Texas Attorney General
Texas Attorney General
Utah Attorney General and Division of Consumer Protection
Vermont Attorney General
United States Department of Justice and federal courts
Virginia Attorney General
Washington Attorney General
Washington Attorney General