Alabama Personal Data Protection Act
Alabama Attorney General
← Back to laws in United States
The Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act is one of the early comprehensive state consumer privacy laws in the United States. It applies to persons that conduct business in Virginia or produce products or services targeted to Virginia residents and meet specified processing or revenue thresholds. The law uses a controller and processor model and gives consumers rights over personal data.
Virginia’s law is important because it influenced several later US state privacy statutes. It focuses on consumer rights, controller duties, processor contracts, data protection assessments and Attorney General enforcement.
The Virginia law applies where a business meets the statutory thresholds based on the number of consumers whose personal data is controlled or processed, or a lower number combined with deriving over 50 percent of gross revenue from the sale of personal data. It excludes certain entities and data, including government bodies, financial institutions or data subject to GLBA, HIPAA covered entities and business associates, nonprofits and higher education institutions.
It also excludes several specific categories of data, including protected health information, FCRA-regulated activity, FERPA-regulated data and other federally regulated information. These exemptions must be applied to the correct data or activity.
Consumer rights: confirm processing, access, correction, deletion, portability and opt-out of targeted advertising, sale and certain profiling.
Controller duties: limit collection, establish reasonable security, avoid discrimination and provide a clear privacy notice.
Privacy notice: disclose categories of personal data, purposes, rights mechanisms, categories shared with third parties and categories of third parties.
Processor contracts: processing on behalf of a controller must be governed by a binding contract with specified duties.
Data protection assessments: required for certain high-risk processing activities.
Virginia consumers may request confirmation of whether a controller is processing their personal data and may access that data. They may correct inaccuracies, delete personal data provided by or obtained about them, obtain a portable copy of personal data previously provided, and opt out of processing for targeted advertising, sale of personal data or profiling in furtherance of decisions that produce legal or similarly significant effects.
Known children’s rights may be exercised by a parent or legal guardian. Controllers and processors that comply with COPPA’s verifiable parental consent requirements are treated as compliant with the parental consent obligation under the Virginia law.
Controllers must provide a reasonably accessible, clear and meaningful privacy notice. The notice should identify categories of personal data processed, purposes, how consumers may exercise rights, categories of data shared with third parties and categories of third parties. If the controller sells personal data or processes data for targeted advertising, that activity and the opt-out method must be clearly and conspicuously disclosed.
Controllers must also establish secure and reliable means for consumers to submit rights requests. They should not require a consumer to create a new account to exercise rights, although use of an existing account may be allowed.
Virginia’s exemptions are important but should not be overextended. A healthcare or financial organisation may have exempt regulated data and non-exempt website, marketing, analytics or consumer support data.
A processor must follow the controller’s instructions and assist with consumer rights requests, security obligations, breach notification support and data protection assessments. The controller-processor contract must set out processing instructions, nature and purpose, data type, duration and the rights and obligations of both parties.
The contract should also address confidentiality, deletion or return of data, information needed to demonstrate compliance, assessments and subcontractor obligations. Data protection assessments should be documented for processing activities that create higher privacy risks.
If Virginia law applies, build compliance around clear notices, consumer rights intake, opt-out workflows, processor contracts and risk assessments. Start with a data map that separates Virginia-covered personal data from federally regulated or exempt data.
Alabama Attorney General
California Privacy Protection Agency
California Privacy Protection Agency
California Privacy Protection Agency
Federal Trade Commission
United States Department of Justice
Colorado Attorney General
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights
Connecticut Attorney General
Federal Trade Commission
Federal Communications Commission
Delaware Department of Justice
United States Department of Justice and federal courts
United States Department of Justice
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
U.S. Department of Education, Student Privacy Policy Office
Federal Trade Commission
Florida Department of Legal Affairs
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and federal health agencies
Federal Trade Commission
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights
Illinois Attorney General and private enforcement
Indiana Attorney General
Iowa Attorney General
Kentucky Attorney General
Louisiana Attorney General
Maryland Attorney General
Minnesota Attorney General
Montana Attorney General, Office of Consumer Protection
Nebraska Attorney General
Nevada Attorney General
New Hampshire Attorney General
New Jersey Attorney General and Division of Consumer Affairs
Oklahoma Attorney General
Oregon Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties
Rhode Island Attorney General
Federal Communications Commission
Tennessee Attorney General
Texas Attorney General
Texas Attorney General
Utah Attorney General and Division of Consumer Protection
Vermont Attorney General
United States Department of Justice and federal courts
Washington Attorney General
Washington Attorney General