Alabama Personal Data Protection Act
Alabama Attorney General
← Back to laws in United States
Utah Consumer Privacy Act is part of the United States state privacy-law framework. It regulates covered processing of personal data about Utah residents and must be assessed separately from federal sectoral laws and other states' statutes.
Effective status: December 31, 2023; material rights amendments effective July 1, 2026
Citation: Utah Code, Title 13, Chapter 61
Source basis: Current Utah Code, Title 13, Chapter 61, including superseded and effective-version annotations.
The Act applies to controllers or processors conducting business in Utah or targeting Utah residents that meet the revenue and processing thresholds in section 13-61-102. The exemptions and threshold elements are cumulative and must be documented.
Thresholds must be calculated using the law's defined consumer population and lookback period. Exemptions should be recorded at entity, data and processing-activity level; an exemption covering one regulated dataset should not automatically be applied to unrelated marketing, website, workforce or customer-support data.
The current code provides confirmation and access, deletion, portability, correction and opt-outs for targeted advertising and sale, subject to the statutory limits. The correction right and related changes effective July 1, 2026 must be included in current workflows.
The operational workflow should authenticate requests without collecting excessive new data, meet the applicable response period, document extensions and denials, propagate deletion and opt-out decisions where required, and preserve evidence of the response and any appeal.
Controllers must publish a notice, maintain reasonable security, restrict secondary use, provide required opt-outs, avoid discrimination and manage sensitive data using the notice, choice and consent rules in the current code. Processor contracts must govern instructions, confidentiality, assistance and deletion or return.
Processor agreements should identify instructions, purpose, duration, data types, confidentiality, subprocessor controls, deletion or return, audit information and assistance with rights, security, breach response and assessments to the extent required by the statute.
Utah originally used a narrower rights model. Current implementation must not reproduce the superseded pre-July 2026 rights text displayed in archived summaries.
The Utah Attorney General enforces referrals from the Division of Consumer Protection. The Act does not create a private right of action.
Maintain an applicability memorandum, data map, notice versions, request and appeal logs, consent and opt-out records, processor contracts, assessment records, security evidence and a dated record of the official statutory version used. Recheck the official legislature and regulator sources before each scheduled legal review.
Use a shared multi-state privacy operating model, but configure it for this law's exact scope, exemptions, rights, deadlines, consent rules, opt-out signals, assessment triggers and enforcement provisions. Do not substitute a generic US privacy checklist for the state-specific controls.
Alabama Attorney General
California Privacy Protection Agency
California Privacy Protection Agency
California Privacy Protection Agency
Federal Trade Commission
United States Department of Justice
Colorado Attorney General
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights
Connecticut Attorney General
Federal Trade Commission
Federal Communications Commission
Delaware Department of Justice
United States Department of Justice and federal courts
United States Department of Justice
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
U.S. Department of Education, Student Privacy Policy Office
Federal Trade Commission
Florida Department of Legal Affairs
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and federal health agencies
Federal Trade Commission
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights
Illinois Attorney General and private enforcement
Indiana Attorney General
Iowa Attorney General
Kentucky Attorney General
Louisiana Attorney General
Maryland Attorney General
Minnesota Attorney General
Montana Attorney General, Office of Consumer Protection
Nebraska Attorney General
Nevada Attorney General
New Hampshire Attorney General
New Jersey Attorney General and Division of Consumer Affairs
Oklahoma Attorney General
Oregon Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties
Rhode Island Attorney General
Federal Communications Commission
Tennessee Attorney General
Texas Attorney General
Texas Attorney General
Vermont Attorney General
United States Department of Justice and federal courts
Virginia Attorney General
Washington Attorney General
Washington Attorney General