Alabama Personal Data Protection Act
Alabama Attorney General
← Back to laws in United States
Colorado Privacy Act is part of the United States state privacy-law framework. It regulates covered processing of personal data about Colorado residents and must be assessed separately from federal sectoral laws and other states' statutes.
Effective status: July 1, 2023
Citation: Colo. Rev. Stat. ss. 6-1-1301 through 6-1-1313
Source basis: Current Colorado Revised Statutes, Title 6, and official Colorado Privacy Act Rules.
The Act applies to controllers conducting business in Colorado or targeting Colorado residents that meet the statutory 100,000-consumer threshold, or the 25,000-consumer threshold combined with revenue or discounts from the sale of personal data. Applicability and exemptions must be tested against the current statute and Colorado Privacy Act Rules.
Thresholds must be calculated using the law's defined consumer population and lookback period. Exemptions should be recorded at entity, data and processing-activity level; an exemption covering one regulated dataset should not automatically be applied to unrelated marketing, website, workforce or customer-support data.
Consumers have rights of access, correction, deletion and portability, and may opt out of targeted advertising, sale and qualifying profiling. Controllers must recognize qualifying universal opt-out mechanisms for sale and targeted advertising.
The operational workflow should authenticate requests without collecting excessive new data, meet the applicable response period, document extensions and denials, propagate deletion and opt-out decisions where required, and preserve evidence of the response and any appeal.
Controllers must provide notices, minimize collection, specify purposes, secure personal data, obtain consent for sensitive data and incompatible secondary uses, contract with processors and conduct data protection assessments for processing that presents a heightened risk of harm.
Processor agreements should identify instructions, purpose, duration, data types, confidentiality, subprocessor controls, deletion or return, audit information and assistance with rights, security, breach response and assessments to the extent required by the statute.
Colorado combines the statute with detailed Attorney General rules covering consent, dark patterns, universal opt-out mechanisms, profiling, assessments and consumer-request operations. Compliance must address both layers.
The Colorado Attorney General and district attorneys enforce the Act as a deceptive trade practice. There is no general private right of action under the Act.
Maintain an applicability memorandum, data map, notice versions, request and appeal logs, consent and opt-out records, processor contracts, assessment records, security evidence and a dated record of the official statutory version used. Recheck the official legislature and regulator sources before each scheduled legal review.
Use a shared multi-state privacy operating model, but configure it for this law's exact scope, exemptions, rights, deadlines, consent rules, opt-out signals, assessment triggers and enforcement provisions. Do not substitute a generic US privacy checklist for the state-specific controls.
Alabama Attorney General
California Privacy Protection Agency
California Privacy Protection Agency
California Privacy Protection Agency
Federal Trade Commission
United States Department of Justice
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights
Connecticut Attorney General
Federal Trade Commission
Federal Communications Commission
Delaware Department of Justice
United States Department of Justice and federal courts
United States Department of Justice
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
U.S. Department of Education, Student Privacy Policy Office
Federal Trade Commission
Florida Department of Legal Affairs
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and federal health agencies
Federal Trade Commission
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights
Illinois Attorney General and private enforcement
Indiana Attorney General
Iowa Attorney General
Kentucky Attorney General
Louisiana Attorney General
Maryland Attorney General
Minnesota Attorney General
Montana Attorney General, Office of Consumer Protection
Nebraska Attorney General
Nevada Attorney General
New Hampshire Attorney General
New Jersey Attorney General and Division of Consumer Affairs
Oklahoma Attorney General
Oregon Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties
Rhode Island Attorney General
Federal Communications Commission
Tennessee Attorney General
Texas Attorney General
Texas Attorney General
Utah Attorney General and Division of Consumer Protection
Vermont Attorney General
United States Department of Justice and federal courts
Virginia Attorney General
Washington Attorney General
Washington Attorney General