Alabama Personal Data Protection Act
Alabama Attorney General
← Back to laws in United States
Federal Trade Commission Act, Section 5 is part of the United States sectoral privacy framework. It should be applied to the covered actor, record, communication, service or practice identified by the statute rather than treated as a general law for all personal data.
Effective status: September 26, 1914, as amended
Citation: 15 U.S.C. s. 45
Source basis: Current 15 U.S.C. section 45 and official FTC privacy and data-security enforcement materials.
Section 5 prohibits unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce. In privacy and security matters, it applies when an organisation misrepresents its practices or causes, or is likely to cause, substantial consumer injury that is not reasonably avoidable and is not outweighed by countervailing benefits, subject to statutory jurisdictional limits.
Organisations should ensure that privacy, security, AI and data-use statements are accurate and substantiated; honor material promises and consumer choices; maintain safeguards proportionate to risk; avoid dark patterns; and remediate known practices that cause substantial consumer injury.
Maintain an evidence-based applicability decision, identify the systems and records within scope, assign owners, configure access and disclosure controls, document legal bases and exceptions, train relevant staff and retain the records needed to demonstrate compliance.
Section 5 is not a checklist statute and does not create a general federal privacy code. Compliance depends on actual practices, representations, consumer injury, FTC rules and the facts developed in enforcement matters.
The Federal Trade Commission enforces Section 5 through administrative and federal-court processes. Remedies depend on the legal route and may include orders, injunctive relief, consumer redress and civil penalties for rule or order violations.
Map this law to specific products, records, communications and teams. Verify current statutory and regulatory text before relying on an exception, consent, permissible purpose or enforcement assumption.
Alabama Attorney General
California Privacy Protection Agency
California Privacy Protection Agency
California Privacy Protection Agency
Federal Trade Commission
United States Department of Justice
Colorado Attorney General
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights
Connecticut Attorney General
Federal Trade Commission
Federal Communications Commission
Delaware Department of Justice
United States Department of Justice and federal courts
United States Department of Justice
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
U.S. Department of Education, Student Privacy Policy Office
Florida Department of Legal Affairs
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and federal health agencies
Federal Trade Commission
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights
Illinois Attorney General and private enforcement
Indiana Attorney General
Iowa Attorney General
Kentucky Attorney General
Louisiana Attorney General
Maryland Attorney General
Minnesota Attorney General
Montana Attorney General, Office of Consumer Protection
Nebraska Attorney General
Nevada Attorney General
New Hampshire Attorney General
New Jersey Attorney General and Division of Consumer Affairs
Oklahoma Attorney General
Oregon Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties
Rhode Island Attorney General
Federal Communications Commission
Tennessee Attorney General
Texas Attorney General
Texas Attorney General
Utah Attorney General and Division of Consumer Protection
Vermont Attorney General
United States Department of Justice and federal courts
Virginia Attorney General
Washington Attorney General
Washington Attorney General