Alabama Personal Data Protection Act
Alabama Attorney General
← Back to laws in United States
Electronic Communications Privacy Act and Stored Communications Act is part of the United States sectoral privacy framework. It should be applied to the covered actor, record, communication, service or practice identified by the statute rather than treated as a general law for all personal data.
Effective status: October 21, 1986, as amended
Citation: 18 U.S.C. Chapters 119 and 121
Source basis: Current Title 18 Chapters 119 and 121 published by the Office of the Law Revision Counsel, plus official DOJ guidance.
ECPA regulates interception of wire, oral and electronic communications, access to stored communications and voluntary or compelled disclosure by electronic communication and remote computing service providers. Coverage depends on the service, communication state, actor and statutory exception.
Providers and other organisations must prevent unauthorized interception and access, restrict voluntary disclosures, validate legal process, distinguish content from non-content records, preserve responsive records lawfully and document reliance on consent, provider-protection or other statutory exceptions.
Maintain an evidence-based applicability decision, identify the systems and records within scope, assign owners, configure access and disclosure controls, document legal bases and exceptions, train relevant staff and retain the records needed to demonstrate compliance.
The Stored Communications Act is the foundation amended by the CLOUD Act. A CLOUD Act assessment does not replace the separate ECPA analysis of interception, unauthorized access, provider disclosures, process type and nondisclosure orders.
The Department of Justice enforces criminal provisions. The statutes also contain civil remedies and specified defenses, limitations and good-faith provisions.
Map this law to specific products, records, communications and teams. Verify current statutory and regulatory text before relying on an exception, consent, permissible purpose or enforcement assumption.
Alabama Attorney General
California Privacy Protection Agency
California Privacy Protection Agency
California Privacy Protection Agency
Federal Trade Commission
United States Department of Justice
Colorado Attorney General
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights
Connecticut Attorney General
Federal Trade Commission
Federal Communications Commission
Delaware Department of Justice
United States Department of Justice and federal courts
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
U.S. Department of Education, Student Privacy Policy Office
Federal Trade Commission
Florida Department of Legal Affairs
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and federal health agencies
Federal Trade Commission
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights
Illinois Attorney General and private enforcement
Indiana Attorney General
Iowa Attorney General
Kentucky Attorney General
Louisiana Attorney General
Maryland Attorney General
Minnesota Attorney General
Montana Attorney General, Office of Consumer Protection
Nebraska Attorney General
Nevada Attorney General
New Hampshire Attorney General
New Jersey Attorney General and Division of Consumer Affairs
Oklahoma Attorney General
Oregon Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties
Rhode Island Attorney General
Federal Communications Commission
Tennessee Attorney General
Texas Attorney General
Texas Attorney General
Utah Attorney General and Division of Consumer Protection
Vermont Attorney General
United States Department of Justice and federal courts
Virginia Attorney General
Washington Attorney General
Washington Attorney General