Alabama Personal Data Protection Act
Alabama Attorney General
← Back to laws in United States
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act is a United States communications law that restricts certain uses of telephone equipment and marketing communications. It is particularly important for businesses that use autodialed calls, prerecorded or artificial voice messages, SMS campaigns, lead generation, call centres, customer reminders, debt collection calls, appointment reminders or fax advertising.
For privacy teams, TCPA compliance is about consent, contact-channel governance and suppression. It is not enough to have a customer’s phone number. The organisation must know how the number was collected, what consent was obtained, what technology will be used, what type of message will be sent and whether the recipient has revoked consent or is on a do-not-call list.
The TCPA restricts certain calls made using an automatic telephone dialing system or an artificial or prerecorded voice, including calls to emergency lines, hospital patient rooms and certain mobile or charged services without required consent. It also regulates prerecorded voice calls to residential lines and unsolicited fax advertisements, subject to statutory exceptions and implementing rules.
Text messages can also create TCPA risk where they are treated as calls for relevant purposes. Businesses using SMS marketing should therefore maintain consent records and opt-out handling with the same seriousness as call compliance.
Autodialed and prerecorded calls: certain calls using regulated technology require prior consent unless an exception applies.
Mobile numbers: calls or texts to mobile or other charged services can carry heightened risk.
Residential calls: artificial or prerecorded voice calls to residential lines are restricted subject to exceptions.
Telephone solicitation: telemarketing calls are subject to consent, relationship and do-not-call requirements.
Fax advertising: unsolicited fax advertisements are specifically regulated.
TCPA compliance depends heavily on being able to prove consent. The business should maintain records showing the phone number, consent language, date, time, source, IP address or form record where applicable, purpose of consent and any later withdrawal.
Lead-generation arrangements need special care. A purchased lead or affiliate-generated contact may not provide valid consent for the buyer’s specific campaign. Consent should be traceable to the actual seller, caller, campaign type and communication channel.
Consumers must be able to stop unwanted communications. A business should maintain suppression lists for calls and texts and ensure that opt-outs are honoured across sales, marketing, support, collections and vendor campaigns. Where a consumer revokes consent, the revocation should be recorded and pushed into the systems that trigger communications.
Internal teams should also distinguish between transactional, informational and marketing messages. A reminder, security alert, delivery update or account notice may be treated differently from a promotional message, but the technology used and the recipient’s number type still matter.
The highest risk often sits with outsourced call centres, lead sellers and marketing automation tools. If vendors call or text on your behalf, your contract and audit process should cover consent evidence, scripts, calling technology, opt-outs and complaint handling.
A TCPA-ready programme should include consent capture, consent language review, number-type screening where appropriate, do-not-call checks, campaign classification, script approval, opt-out processing, vendor controls, complaint review and record retention. The compliance system should be connected to CRM and dialler tools, not maintained only in policy documents.
Businesses should also monitor changes in calling technology and regulatory interpretation. The legal assessment may change depending on how numbers are stored, generated, selected and dialled.
If you call or text US consumers, treat phone numbers as regulated communication permissions. Build consent evidence, suppress opt-outs quickly, govern vendors, review dialling technology and separate marketing from transactional communications before campaigns go live.
Alabama Attorney General
California Privacy Protection Agency
California Privacy Protection Agency
California Privacy Protection Agency
Federal Trade Commission
United States Department of Justice
Colorado Attorney General
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights
Connecticut Attorney General
Federal Trade Commission
Federal Communications Commission
Delaware Department of Justice
United States Department of Justice and federal courts
United States Department of Justice
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
U.S. Department of Education, Student Privacy Policy Office
Federal Trade Commission
Florida Department of Legal Affairs
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and federal health agencies
Federal Trade Commission
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights
Illinois Attorney General and private enforcement
Indiana Attorney General
Iowa Attorney General
Kentucky Attorney General
Louisiana Attorney General
Maryland Attorney General
Minnesota Attorney General
Montana Attorney General, Office of Consumer Protection
Nebraska Attorney General
Nevada Attorney General
New Hampshire Attorney General
New Jersey Attorney General and Division of Consumer Affairs
Oklahoma Attorney General
Oregon Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties
Rhode Island Attorney General
Tennessee Attorney General
Texas Attorney General
Texas Attorney General
Utah Attorney General and Division of Consumer Protection
Vermont Attorney General
United States Department of Justice and federal courts
Virginia Attorney General
Washington Attorney General
Washington Attorney General