Alabama Personal Data Protection Act
Alabama Attorney General
← Back to laws in United States
The Iowa Consumer Data Protection Act creates privacy obligations for covered controllers and processors that handle personal data of Iowa consumers. It follows the broader US state privacy model but has its own definitions, exemptions, consumer rights, controller duties and enforcement structure.
The Act should not be treated as a copy of California law. It is narrower in some respects and uses its own statutory language. Businesses serving Iowa residents should check whether the Act applies and then build rights, notice and processor-contract workflows around the Iowa requirements.
Iowa consumers may submit requests to exercise rights through the means specified by the controller. The law includes rights to confirm processing and access personal data, delete personal data provided by the consumer, obtain a copy of personal data previously provided by the consumer in a portable and readily usable format, and opt out of the sale of personal data.
Parents or legal guardians may exercise rights on behalf of known children. Controllers must authenticate requests where required and handle consumer requests through secure and reliable means.
Consumer rights: access, deletion of data provided by the consumer, portability and opt-out of sale.
Privacy notice: controllers must disclose categories of personal data processed, purposes, rights mechanisms and categories of data and third parties involved in sharing.
Targeted advertising and sale disclosure: if a controller sells personal data or engages in targeted advertising, it must clearly and conspicuously disclose that activity and explain how to opt out.
Processor duties: processors must assist controllers with rights requests, security obligations and breach-related obligations where reasonably practicable.
Contracts: controller-processor contracts must set out instructions, nature and purpose of processing, type of data, duration and duties of both parties.
The Iowa privacy notice should explain the categories of personal data processed, the purposes of processing, how consumers may exercise rights, how appeals work where applicable, categories of personal data shared with third parties and categories of third parties with whom data is shared.
Controllers must establish secure and reliable methods for consumer requests. The method should consider how consumers normally interact with the controller and should support authentication. A controller should not require a consumer to create a new account just to exercise rights, although use of an existing account may be required where appropriate.
Processors must assist controllers with consumer rights requests, security of processing and security breach-related obligations where reasonably practicable. A written contract should govern processing, confidentiality, deletion or return of data, subcontractors and information needed to demonstrate compliance.
As with other state laws, the distinction between controller and processor is practical. It should be based on who determines the purposes and means of processing, not merely on what the commercial contract calls the parties.
Iowa’s law should be configured separately in a US state privacy matrix. Do not assume that rights, sensitive data rules, appeal rules and assessment duties are identical to California, Delaware, Texas or Virginia.
The Iowa law includes exemptions for several categories of federally regulated information and activities, including certain HIPAA, FCRA, FERPA, COPPA and other data categories. These exemptions need careful mapping because a business may hold both exempt and non-exempt data.
For example, a financial or healthcare business may have some data flows governed by federal law and other consumer, website or marketing data flows that need separate review.
If Iowa law applies, update your privacy notice, configure rights workflows, disclose sale and targeted advertising where relevant, review processor contracts and document which data falls inside or outside the Act because of federal-law exemptions.
Alabama Attorney General
California Privacy Protection Agency
California Privacy Protection Agency
California Privacy Protection Agency
Federal Trade Commission
United States Department of Justice
Colorado Attorney General
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights
Connecticut Attorney General
Federal Trade Commission
Federal Communications Commission
Delaware Department of Justice
United States Department of Justice and federal courts
United States Department of Justice
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
U.S. Department of Education, Student Privacy Policy Office
Federal Trade Commission
Florida Department of Legal Affairs
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and federal health agencies
Federal Trade Commission
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights
Illinois Attorney General and private enforcement
Indiana Attorney General
Kentucky Attorney General
Louisiana Attorney General
Maryland Attorney General
Minnesota Attorney General
Montana Attorney General, Office of Consumer Protection
Nebraska Attorney General
Nevada Attorney General
New Hampshire Attorney General
New Jersey Attorney General and Division of Consumer Affairs
Oklahoma Attorney General
Oregon Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties
Rhode Island Attorney General
Federal Communications Commission
Tennessee Attorney General
Texas Attorney General
Texas Attorney General
Utah Attorney General and Division of Consumer Protection
Vermont Attorney General
United States Department of Justice and federal courts
Virginia Attorney General
Washington Attorney General
Washington Attorney General